HOME ACADEMICS ADMISSIONS ARCHIVES SOCIETIES EVENTS SPORTS ALUMNI  
Invitation
Principal's Speech
Report
Photo Gallery

Doha Debates

On 15th February, 2010 a long queue of over 350 students wound its way in Andrews Court, stretching from the doors of the St. Stephen's College Hall. For the first time the Doha Debates, a joint venture by the BBC and the Qatar Foundation, was being hosted in India. After three months of working across the seas with shipments and e-mails flying regularly between the 'Doha people' (as we came to call them) and the working group set up by the Principal, comprising Mr. Grewal and Ms. Tanya Bhattacharyya, in additional to the Principal, finally in mid-February the results were there for all to see. Within a period of three nights we had a vastly improved new College Hall with an innovative stage set-up and Doha Debate posters all over the Delhi University campus, both North and South. The topic of the debate (THBT: Muslims in India aren't getting a fair deal) was not highly publicized. The response evoked exceeded expectations by far and the spill-over audience had to be accommodated on the Mess lawns with live feed on large monitors. The moderator and founder of the Doha Debates, Tim Sebastian, was the star attraction and he did not disappoint! The speakers in favour of the motion were Seema Mustafa, a political journalist for Covert Magazine, and Teesta Seetalvad, a social and political activist. Those arguing against the motion were Shri. M. J. Akbar, journalist and owner of Covert Magazine, and Shri. Sachin Pilot, an ex-Stephanian and the youngest member of the current Parliament.

 

The contention of the proposition was that the responsibility for the decreasing representation of Muslims in Government services, deteriorating standards of education and gender equality in the Muslim community had to be shared by the Indian Government as well as the Muslim elites. The opposition's defence was that the Indian state stood for secularism and equal rights for all communities and that even raising the question of community-based discrimination was an unfair means of changing the discourse to a direction that was not desirable. To the proposition's very consistent questions about statistical indicators of falling Muslim participation and development however, the other side did not very have very many counters besides pointing towards occasional figures 'like Shah Rukh Khan'. M. J. Akbar’s stand was relatively mid-way as he insisted that while Muslims might not be getting as fair deal as they should, it was, in comparison to past years improving steadily. Again, an assertion that was countered with statistical ammunition by Teesta Seetalvad who spoke of falling development standards since Partition, it was perhaps taken by a large part of the audience uncritically because it was a surprise for many when the final vote from the house announced a clear victory for the opposition. The vote was preceded by a number of questions from the floor, mostly directed at the Opposition, and all this contributed to the general element of surprise when the polling results flashed on the screens. Or perhaps the surprise wasn't that general, even though it certainly was keenly felt by several people.

 

          The Doha Debates are crucial in that they bring with them a tradition of debate on controversial issues. It was important for students to listen to issues being debated that have hitherto been untouched or considered too 'sensitive' to be broached in the University and though the polling results were an indicator that people are still not willing to question what is unpleasant to contemplate, this was at least a significant beginning. Moreover, the Doha team brought along a wonderful multitude of people, ranging from Executive Directors to Set Designers and most importantly, a group of 10 students from Qatar, who represented a wide variety of nationalities. For those of us who were lucky enough to interact with some of these people the entire Doha Debate experience was one that carried a flavour of healthy debate, interaction and a general widening of horizons. For the rest, who attended the final debate in the College Hall on the 15th, the Doha Debate was certainly something on a scale rarely, if ever, witnessed in college before. The debate was only a one-day affair but reminders linger everywhere, from the superb sets on stage and the fresh carpets on the floor to the numerous people wearing Doha Debate T-shirts. One only hopes that the spirit of debate and questioning lingers more strongly in the minds of people than these tangible reminders.

 

        Tania Bhattacharyya
President
The Debating Society

 


Copyright © 2007 St. Stephen's College. All rights reserved.  Terms of Service. Privacy Policy. Right To Information Act.
Send technical enquires and report errors or broken links to webteam.stephens@gmail.com  
Founding Team   Renovation Team   Present WebTeam